3 ms·
well put. if their mission is to help protect vulnerable communities, and the effort to post on X is near zero ( it can be automated or take just a moment manu
by tonymet 7mo ago
well put. if their mission is to help protect vulnerable communities, and the effort to post on X is near zero ( it can be automated or take just a moment manually), they are betraying their mission to help protect as many vulnerable communities as possible.
- cogman10 7mo agoThat's not EFF's mission. They are not an organization that deals in helping vulnerable communities. They are an organization dedicated to improving electronic ownership and privacy. At most, X only serves as a marketing/fundraising mechanism. Nothing more. And the EFF doesn't really need to do that as I'm certain their victories and fights will still be shared on X without them.
- tonymet 7mo agoAdvocacy and awareness is one of their primary efforts. And they are defending LGBT and abortion rights . Those aren’t abstract , those are for people
- antonvs 7mo agoShould they also be posting on other ideologically similar sites such as Stormfront and Truth Social?
- tonymet 6mo agoi doubt they have any reach or engagement there, so it's not germane to this decision.
- antonvs 6mo agoAre explicit white supremacy, undermining of democratic values, and morality in general also “not germane to this decision”?
- tonymet 6mo agoAre you saying that X / Twitter has more of that content than the other platforms they are remaining on like IG / Reels & Tiktok? Because IG/Reels in particular is notorious for that, and Tiktok used to be (but I haven't used it since the buyout)