4 ms·
This seems completely unnecessary and performative. I have a hard time understanding how reducing their reach could possibly be helpful to the goals of the orga
by rockemsockem 6mo ago
This seems completely unnecessary and performative. I have a hard time understanding how reducing their reach could possibly be helpful to the goals of the organization. I'm definitely going to keep donating to them, but I'm concerned.
- ruszki 6mo agoHow do you know that they reduce their reach to their target audience in any considerable way? According to their article their reach on X is about 3% of what was 7 years ago, and god knows how much is bot from those 3%.
- rockemsockem 6mo agoHere's my simple criteria. I'm on Twitter/X, but none of the other social media sites they list (I mean, I'm on LinkedIn, but not in any sort of regular way). So their reach to me personally is diminished. Obviously I'll still go on their website if I want to keep up with their activities and I'll probably still hear relevant news about them though.
- ruszki 6mo agoIt seems to me that you realized at the end that "their reach to [you] personally is [absolutely not] diminished".
- rockemsockem 6mo agoMe doing other things to get that same information means that it is diminished.
- MiguelX413 6mo agoWell if we're going off of total user counts of platforms, Twitter is pretty niche. I'm on every social media besides it. I couldn't stand it before Musk and I can't stand it now.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]