the conclusion doesnt follow from the premise is the issue. the laws and enclosure happened basically orthogonal to the respurce constraints, so there's no act

the conclusion doesnt follow from the premise is the issue. the laws and enclosure happened basically orthogonal to the respurce constraints, so there's no actual comparison to draw. if you insist on a causation, id go with the opposite - the laws making ownership and forcing people off of land enabled the exploitation and innovation, not that it was cleanup for exploitation that was already happening. existing exploitation across all kinds of degrees was already being managed without the enclosure. if you just want to make stuff up, you can reference anything you want, like that some elaborate thing happened in star wars, and thus the same thing must be happening with AI