3 ms·
If they were 'clearly different' we would not have the concept of the CEO fraud attack: https://www.barclayscorporate.com/insights/fraud-protection/ceo-fraud/
by jodrellblank 6mo ago
If they were 'clearly different' we would not have the concept of the CEO fraud attack:
https://www.barclayscorporate.com/insights/fraud-protection/ceo-fraud/ https://www.barclayscorporate.com/insights/fraud-protection/...
That's an attack because trusted and untrusted input goes through the same human brain input pathways, which can't always tell them apart.
- runarberg 6mo agoYour parent made no claim about all swans being white. So finding a black swan has no effect on their argument.
- jodrellblank 6mo agoMy parent made a claim that humans have separate pathways for data and instructions and cannot mix them up like LLMs do. Showing that we don't has every effect on refuting their argument. >>> The principal security problem of LLMs is that there is no architectural boundary between data and control paths. >> Exactly like human input to output. > no nothing like that but actually yes, exactly like that.