3 ms·
> This is what I was responding to. I do not understand your thinking in this post. I thought it was clear from "refuses to include any sort of consent" that I
by lelanthran 7mo ago
> This is what I was responding to. I do not understand your thinking in this post.
I thought it was clear from "refuses to include any sort of consent" that I am talking specifically about holding an opinion that refuses to include consideration for consent, not refuses consent for usage.
- altruios 7mo agoBut that's what I'm confused about: How is freely giving consent for (all) others to read your content not 'considering consent'? I'm not trying to be snarky. I really don't see the missing piece that isn't written that connects those dots.