3 ms·

All you need to know about this "quest": https://xcancel.com/austinhill/status/2041986130871251141 https://xcancel.com/austinhill/status/2041986130871251141 Pl

All you need to know about this "quest": https://xcancel.com/austinhill/status/2041986130871251141 https://xcancel.com/austinhill/status/2041986130871251141 Plus, the most obvious reason that Adam Back is not Satoshi is that he'd absolutely take credit for Bitcoin if he could. And he would have put an end to Craig Wright's legal circus. The most plausible explanation is that Satoshi is either dead or incapacitated.

eddiewithzato 7mo ago
Look at his comment here, then you will realize why it’s definitely Back. And why he certainly would never claim to be satoshi https://xcancel.com/adam3us/status/2041816020776611935?s=46 https://xcancel.com/adam3us/status/2041816020776611935?s=46
- olalonde 7mo ago
  I didn't realize anything. Everyone and their mother has been saying that about Satoshi since day one... Also, Adam would have infinitely more to gain from being Satoshi than from Satoshi remaining unknown. He's been trying to take credit for Bitcoin ever since he realized that Bitcoin was actually worth something (he initially dismissed it). All his actions point to someone who's largely motivated by financial gain whereas Satoshi hasn't touched a single of his 1M+ BTC. If you're interested in serious research about Satoshi's identity, try this paper instead: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10257 https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10257
  - adastra22 7mo ago
    And your HN account was created right between the release of the white paper and Bitcoin 0.1. Coincidence? Are you Satoshi?!? That’s about the level of investigative journalism performed by NYT here. Thanks for being sensible.
    - olalonde 7mo ago
      Maybe :) But seriously, Satoshi is most likely a relatively unknown dude. Why would you spend so much effort hiding your identity and then become a very public figure of the Bitcoin community?
      - adastra22 7mo ago
        I founded a company with Adam. He is not Satoshi. Neither is Szabo. Best not to speculate publicly as no good comes from it - not least of which there are organized crime rings targeting potential suspects for violent kidnapping or home invasion.
        silisili 7mo ago
        Not to be a jerk, but it'd be helpful for a reader to know how and why you came to that conclusion.
        adastra22 7mo ago
        Not to be a jerk, but none of this is anybody's business.
        storystraight 7mo ago
        you literally detailed why you think it’s not him in another comment. You can’t even get your story straight. Give actual evidence or keep your mouth shut for everyone’s sake since it doesn’t add anything to the discussion
        deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
- szmarczak 7mo ago
  As per the quotes, it could've been that he had read them, liked them and kept repeating them. However given other matching circumstances such as grammar this becomes unlikely. Also, this is just a single journalist; to know precisely this should be outsourced to a company doing forensics.
ergocoder 7mo ago
> The most plausible explanation is that Satoshi is either dead or incapacitated. He could have lost the key and doesn't want to be a target or ridiculed. Happened to a lot of people.

eddiewithzato 7mo ago

Look at his comment here, then you will realize why it’s definitely Back. And why he certainly would never claim to be satoshi https://xcancel.com/adam3us/status/2041816020776611935?s=46 https://xcancel.com/adam3us/status/2041816020776611935?s=46

olalonde 7mo ago
I didn't realize anything. Everyone and their mother has been saying that about Satoshi since day one... Also, Adam would have infinitely more to gain from being Satoshi than from Satoshi remaining unknown. He's been trying to take credit for Bitcoin ever since he realized that Bitcoin was actually worth something (he initially dismissed it). All his actions point to someone who's largely motivated by financial gain whereas Satoshi hasn't touched a single of his 1M+ BTC. If you're interested in serious research about Satoshi's identity, try this paper instead: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10257 https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10257
- adastra22 7mo ago
  And your HN account was created right between the release of the white paper and Bitcoin 0.1. Coincidence? Are you Satoshi?!? That’s about the level of investigative journalism performed by NYT here. Thanks for being sensible.
  - olalonde 7mo ago
    Maybe :) But seriously, Satoshi is most likely a relatively unknown dude. Why would you spend so much effort hiding your identity and then become a very public figure of the Bitcoin community?
    - adastra22 7mo ago
      I founded a company with Adam. He is not Satoshi. Neither is Szabo. Best not to speculate publicly as no good comes from it - not least of which there are organized crime rings targeting potential suspects for violent kidnapping or home invasion.
      - silisili 7mo ago
        Not to be a jerk, but it'd be helpful for a reader to know how and why you came to that conclusion.
        adastra22 7mo ago
        Not to be a jerk, but none of this is anybody's business.
        storystraight 7mo ago
        you literally detailed why you think it’s not him in another comment. You can’t even get your story straight. Give actual evidence or keep your mouth shut for everyone’s sake since it doesn’t add anything to the discussion
        deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
szmarczak 7mo ago
As per the quotes, it could've been that he had read them, liked them and kept repeating them. However given other matching circumstances such as grammar this becomes unlikely. Also, this is just a single journalist; to know precisely this should be outsourced to a company doing forensics.

ergocoder 7mo ago

> The most plausible explanation is that Satoshi is either dead or incapacitated. He could have lost the key and doesn't want to be a target or ridiculed. Happened to a lot of people.