4 ms·
Hell yeah! After all these years it's finally here. One thing I miss here (and admittedly I only skimmed through the post so if I missed this, please do correc
by utf_8x 6mo ago
Hell yeah! After all these years it's finally here.
One thing I miss here (and admittedly I only skimmed through the post so if I missed this, please do correct me) is "ad hoc" unions.
It would be great to be able to do something like
public Union<TypeA, TypeB> GetThing()...
Without having to declare the union first. Basically OneOf<...> but built-in and more integrated
- debugnik 6mo agoI guess you can define union Union<T1, T2>(T1, T2); Add a bunch of overloads and you'd replicate for T1|T2 syntax the equivalent mess to (Value)Tuple<...> that eventually became the backing for actual tuple syntax.