4 ms·
Comes impressively close to GPT 5.4 / Gemini 3.1 Pro / Opus 4.6! Mostly behind OpenAI on coding/agentic benchmarks, behind Google on text reasoning, behind Anth
by granzymes 6mo ago
Comes impressively close to GPT 5.4 / Gemini 3.1 Pro / Opus 4.6! Mostly behind OpenAI on coding/agentic benchmarks, behind Google on text reasoning, behind Anthropic on Humanity's Last Exam with tools (surprisingly the only benchmark where Anthropic leads currently).
Meta hasn’t fully caught up, but they came close and I think can solidly claim to be a frontier lab again. I’d call it a 3.5 horse race right now, and hopefully their next model improves. More model competition is good!
Poor Grok 4.2 should probably be dropped from the table.
- fancy_pantser 6mo agoIt's looking rather low on reasoning and long-range problems with the approach described. For example, even with 16 agents and compaction, the HLE score is significantly below Anthropic's Mythos. Like you, I can see the release as a net Good Thing, but apples-to-apples for each org's latest models do have Meta holding steady in the middle pack.
- zozbot234 6mo agoHLE encompasses very hard problems where the larger pretraining of Mythos probably matters quite a bit. I'm not saying that Mythos is not showing some amount of genuine improvement compared to e.g. the latest Opus; just that if you're going to compare models, you should at least make sure that the overall test-time workload is in the same ballpark given how high it seems to be for Mythos.
- deanc 6mo agoGrok code was my daily driver for months while it was free and it was fantastic - it is certainly no worse than it was a few months ago. Unfortunately with LLMs everything is based off your use case, domain and the context you give it. I also use Grok daily for health questions as the other models are too afraid to give input on medical matters
- flufluflufluffy 6mo agoWhy do you need to ask any AI questions regarding your health every day?
- deanc 6mo agoBecause I am going through a series of health issues.