3 ms·
No? I have locks on my house and car that I have the keys for. That an argument _for_ secure boot.
by dwattttt 6mo ago
No? I have locks on my house and car that I have the keys for. That an argument _for_ secure boot.
- jrm4 6mo agoIt is absolutely not. It's a decent one for "locks on an apartment building that someone else owns." But no, purchasing a house ought not include by default "a set of locks that you must work around, permission-wise."
- robotresearcher 6mo agoFunnily enough, when you buy a house, the first task is to change all the locks. Y’know, for security.
- jrm4 6mo agoSure. Now, of the people who buy houses -- how many of them would find this a difficult or onerous task? And then, do computers. Apples and oranges here, for this point.
- robotresearcher 6mo agoCost me $500 recently. Not difficult, but costly.
- Spooky23 6mo agoSorry dwattttt, I’m unable to verify your identity and your keys are disabled. If you have an issue, please fax a copy of your DUNS number.
- dwattttt 6mo agoYou don't have the ability to revoke my keys on this machine, that's the point. Not even MS could do that, because these are _my_ keys. The alternative proposed here is no keys at all.