3 ms·
refuse consent? You may need to clarify that thought. I don't think the poster has a viewpoint that 'refuses consent', their viewpoint is their writing they p
by altruios 6mo ago
refuse consent?
You may need to clarify that thought.
I don't think the poster has a viewpoint that 'refuses consent', their viewpoint is their writing they put for others to view is for others to view, regardless of how it is viewed. They seem to be giving consent, not refusing it, no?
- lelanthran 6mo ago> refuse consent? Who said anything about refusing consent?
- altruios 6mo ago> I think you are walking all around the word "consent" and trying very hard to avoid it altogether. > Your perspective, because it refuses to include any sort of consent, is invalid. No perspective that refuses consent can be valid. This is what I was responding to. I do not understand your thinking in this post.
- lelanthran 6mo ago> This is what I was responding to. I do not understand your thinking in this post. I thought it was clear from "refuses to include any sort of consent" that I am talking specifically about holding an opinion that refuses to include consideration for consent, not refuses consent for usage.
- altruios 6mo agoBut that's what I'm confused about: How is freely giving consent for (all) others to read your content not 'considering consent'? I'm not trying to be snarky. I really don't see the missing piece that isn't written that connects those dots.