Yeah, they're also failing to ignore a few other important factors: What about other bloggers like Darren Rowse, Perez Hilton,etc.? Seems like the article is

Yeah, they're also failing to ignore a few other important factors: What about other bloggers like Darren Rowse, Perez Hilton,etc.? Seems like the article is portraying the story as either you have to make 5k a year or 200k a year. That clearly isn't the way it works. What about a ton of the other networks that have done well or even more individual blogs. Gothamist blogs, b5 media, etc. Glam media is doing insanely well. I also wouldn't equate Dan Lyons' efforts to that of Mike Arrington.