2 ms·

reglardless if it was, it was an agreement with the US who can be convinced with money to stop the bombs. Israel is a different beast. they will only accept dea

reglardless if it was, it was an agreement with the US who can be convinced with money to stop the bombs. Israel is a different beast. they will only accept death as payment. and yes because Iran does include it in their terms it.means US now gets to fight Israel.with diplomacy :') again.

halflife 7mo ago
[flagged]
- SyneRyder 7mo ago
  Not that anyone is going to listen to Australia, but Australia believes it is part of the ceasefire terms that were agreed to: Asked on 7.30 if the ceasefire should apply to Israel's action in Lebanon, [Australian Foreign Minister] Senator Wong was adamant it should. "Yes," she said. "Our position is that the world expects that the ceasefire should apply to the region." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-08/penny-wong-says-israel-should-stop-actions-in-lebanon/106543962 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-08/penny-wong-says-israe...
  - AnimalMuppet 7mo ago
    "Our position is that it should" is very different from "the text of their statement says". This is Senator Wong's (or Australia's) idea of what would happen in an ideal world, not anything anybody involved recognizes as relevant. (I mean, they may not recognize the text as being relevant, either, but this is a step below even that.)
- lejalv 7mo ago
  Its the 10-point plan of Iran which forms the basis of the ceasefire. I don't think it can get much more clear that the US lost this war, along with dignity, decorum and the respect of the world.
  - halflife 7mo ago
    [flagged]