3 ms·

For land pipelines thiere no eqauvalent of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea according to which both Oman and Iran should allow free passage o

For land pipelines thiere no eqauvalent of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea according to which both Oman and Iran should allow free passage of ships. And "normal" path lies on Oman's waters which dones't stop Iran from attacking ships there. The strait toll is a pure racketeering.

surgical_fire 6mo ago
What does the UN convention says about killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure? I think any such pretenses were abandoned right off the start.
- ithkuil 6mo ago
  You make it sound that there are only two sides in this story. Spain, Argentina, Kenya, Indonesia, Kuwait and countless other countries haven't bombed any civilian infrastructure either and yet they will be affected by the aggressive posture around international maritime traffic. Are you expecting that Iran will not apply the fee to ships that sell oil Malesia or South Africa?
  - surgical_fire 6mo ago
    For the Iranian perspective it doesn't matter. Their only defense against being bombed was using their geopolitical position to its advantage. Their own civilian infrastructure was bombed by the US-Israel axis, with the support of the Gulf states. I fully expect Iran to apply fees on every ship going through, and they should. Spain, Argentina, Kenya, Indonesia and countless other countries are paying for the aggressive and reckless actions of the US-Israel axis. That's the situation of the country where I live btw. I don't blame Iran for using the weapons at their disposal for survival, I blame the rogue states that attacked Iran and forced their hand. Let's not forget that Iran could have done it at any time in the past decades, and showed restraint in doing so, even with all the sanctions and Israeli aggression.
insane_dreamer 6mo ago
The UNCLOS, you say? Guess which two countries haven't signed/ratified it: US and Israel. So yeah, I don't see Iran paying much attention to the UNCLOS.

surgical_fire 6mo ago

What does the UN convention says about killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure? I think any such pretenses were abandoned right off the start.

ithkuil 6mo ago
You make it sound that there are only two sides in this story. Spain, Argentina, Kenya, Indonesia, Kuwait and countless other countries haven't bombed any civilian infrastructure either and yet they will be affected by the aggressive posture around international maritime traffic. Are you expecting that Iran will not apply the fee to ships that sell oil Malesia or South Africa?
- surgical_fire 6mo ago
  For the Iranian perspective it doesn't matter. Their only defense against being bombed was using their geopolitical position to its advantage. Their own civilian infrastructure was bombed by the US-Israel axis, with the support of the Gulf states. I fully expect Iran to apply fees on every ship going through, and they should. Spain, Argentina, Kenya, Indonesia and countless other countries are paying for the aggressive and reckless actions of the US-Israel axis. That's the situation of the country where I live btw. I don't blame Iran for using the weapons at their disposal for survival, I blame the rogue states that attacked Iran and forced their hand. Let's not forget that Iran could have done it at any time in the past decades, and showed restraint in doing so, even with all the sanctions and Israeli aggression.

insane_dreamer 6mo ago

The UNCLOS, you say? Guess which two countries haven't signed/ratified it: US and Israel. So yeah, I don't see Iran paying much attention to the UNCLOS.