2 ms·
I don't think it's too misleading. There have been atomic-optical magnetometers developed with sensitivity of 10s of fT/√Hz, so approaching the quantum noise li
by kuhsaft 6mo ago
I don't think it's too misleading. There have been atomic-optical magnetometers developed with sensitivity of 10s of fT/√Hz, so approaching the quantum noise limit. The issue seems to be SNR to a certain extent.
In an ideal situation, such as being isolated in a desert, detecting the heart within meters is achievable, within a kilometer plausible, within 10s of kilometers implausible.
It's also a matter of just getting plausible detection. If you get a reading that might be a heart, you can move closer. Being able to move the detector provides much better search capabilities.
- gus_massa 6mo agoHow do you distinguish a heart of a human and the heart of a rat with at that distance and that noise level? I've used https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock-in_amplifier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock-in_amplifier and in ideal conditions you get a 10^6 amplification, when you send a very clean signal and measure how it bounce. My expert opinion is that 10^18 is im-facking-possible.
- kuhsaft 6mo ago> How do you distinguish a heart of a human and the heart of a rat with at that distance and that noise level? A rat has a resting heart rate above 200bpm. The only thing similar to a human heart beat would be of a dog, pig, goat, or sheep.