3 ms·
There is flip side to it. If one party has pre-determined not to negotiate, but is just following the script to show offical reachout and due process, then peop
by ghywertelling 6mo ago
There is flip side to it. If one party has pre-determined not to negotiate, but is just following the script to show offical reachout and due process, then people don't know the real reason why the talks failed?
- throw0101c 6mo ago> […] then people don't know the real reason why the talks failed? A party can always disclose what's going on in negotiations. This is generally not done as it is often is a violation of trust, but if there's no good faith there in the first place it's hardly a loss. Negotiations can always be broken off with the reason being "the other side is not negotiating in good faith" without particular negotiated-to-day conditions being released.
- ghywertelling 6mo agoBut my original proposition keeps everyone honest and pragmatic which was the reason for the proposal. I truly believe in transparency as a way to keep everyone honest and not treat other people as childish that they can't understand complex matters.