3 ms·
It's a stretch for sure. I think the point is that it's a tradeoff of civil liberties in exchange for safety. I think it's an interesting discussion and it's
by peab 6mo ago
It's a stretch for sure.
I think the point is that it's a tradeoff of civil liberties in exchange for safety.
I think it's an interesting discussion and it's not clear to me what the right answer is.
Given the first amendment in the USA, i think once it's cheap enough everyone will be filming everyone all the time. Just look at how many people have ring doorbells.
- kennywinker 6mo agoThe first amendment?? Is surveillance speech now? Lets add it to the list: money is speech, surveillance is speech, protesting is NOT speech. Anything I’m missing?
- peab 6mo agoYou have a protected right to photograph or film things that are plainly visible from public spaces, including federal buildings, transportation facilities, and police interactions