3 ms·
Actually, signing was one of the annoying parts of jujutsu for me: I sign with a security key, and the way jujutsu handled signing was very painful to me (I kno
by palata 7mo ago
Actually, signing was one of the annoying parts of jujutsu for me: I sign with a security key, and the way jujutsu handled signing was very painful to me (I know it can be configured and I tried a few different ways, but it felt inherent to how jujutsu handles commits (revisions?)).
- arccy 7mo agoThe only reasonable way to use signing in jj is with the sign-on-push config https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/config/#automatically-signing-commits https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/config/#automatically-signing... rather than as commits are made
- Zambyte 7mo agoWhy? I have my signing behavior set to own and I haven't noticed any issues, but I don't actually rely on signatures for much.
- singron 7mo agoIf you need to type in a password to unlock your keychain (e.g. default behavior for gpg-agent), then signing commits one at a time constantly is annoying. Does "own" try to sign working copy snapshot commits too? That would greatly increase the number and frequency of signatures.
- Zambyte 7mo agoAh, I use my SSH key to sign my commits and I don't have a password on my SSH key. > Does "own" try to sign working copy snapshot commits too? Yes