4 ms·
Weird, from the outside it seems like bombing civilians and infrastructure is more inflammatory and antagonizing than some words/propaganda.
by WaxProlix 6mo ago
Weird, from the outside it seems like bombing civilians and infrastructure is more inflammatory and antagonizing than some words/propaganda.
- BobbyJo 6mo ago[flagged]
- donkeybeer 6mo agoLet me summarize the argument more cleanly: Words are violence!!! Hearing death to America hurt me badly!! vs actual invasions and bombings of your mainland from two hyperviolent countries with a long history of the same
- BobbyJo 6mo agoWho's argument are you summarizing? Is this about the repeat comment?
- donkeybeer 6mo agoThe persons you were talking to.
- BobbyJo 6mo agoThe were arguing the opposite of what you said if anything. You sure you didn't respond to the wrong comment?
- donkeybeer 6mo agoBig scary words are not violence. They can't hurt you. Bombings and invasions that killed people are violence.
- BobbyJo 6mo agoI agree, I'm just confused where that fits in this thread.
- donkeybeer 6mo agoActual violence is much more antagonizing than mere hurt feelings.
- BobbyJo 6mo agoI wouldn't classify full scale war as "antagonizing," but, if you want to downplay it, be my guest.
- tovej 6mo agoAsk the same dumb question, get the same answer.