4 ms·
Are they actually too dangerous to publicly release? It seems like a little bit of marketing from the model-producing companies to raise more funding. It's impo
by camdenreslink 6mo ago
Are they actually too dangerous to publicly release? It seems like a little bit of marketing from the model-producing companies to raise more funding. It's important to look at who specifically is making that statement and what their incentives are. There are hundreds of billions of dollars poured into this thing at this point.
- bottlepalm 6mo agoYou really think some marketers got leaders from companies across the industry to come together to make a video - and they're all in on the conspiracy because money?
- wonderfulcheese 6mo agoYeah
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- Toutouxc 6mo agoHow is that even remotely implausible?
- bottlepalm 6mo agoIt’s a lot more implausible than a really smart model that fits the trend line of models getting smarter perfectly. Why is everyone here trying to invent conspiracies to explain the obvious? Actually I do know why - cope.
- theshackleford 6mo agoThat’s literally exactly the kind of thing marketing does, and has been doing for a very long time. Did you just arrive on earth from outer space or something?
- camdenreslink 6mo agoYes? Saying "conspiracy" is overstating things. A company can make a marketing push overselling their product and then have exclusive corporate partners that benefit from being associated with that marketing. That just seems like normal business that happens every day, and being skeptical of marketing messages should be your default position.