I agree of course.. But it's even worse than that. Seems like half the time ipv6 comes up on NANOG, they're talking about the abdomination that is NAT66. (Rest

I agree of course.. But it's even worse than that. Seems like half the time ipv6 comes up on NANOG, they're talking about the abdomination that is NAT66. (Rest of the time they're talking about NAT46 of course.) I have little confidence in the Internet's end-to-end routing getting fixed unless and until the Internet backbone itself changes shape to something less conducive to monopoly.