3 ms·
I mean it was messed up, which is why the other world powers raced to develop their own capabilities. And it remains messed up to this day - some countries get
by pizlonator 7mo ago
I mean it was messed up, which is why the other world powers raced to develop their own capabilities.
And it remains messed up to this day - some countries get to be under their own nuclear umbrella, while others don't.
This kind of selective distribution of superpowers doesn't lead to great outcomes
- baq 7mo agoin that case in particular it led to 80 years of relatively calm geopolitics kinetically, all things considered. I'm not sure I want to live through an AI cold war, but it sure seems I don't get to choose.
- pizlonator 7mo ago> relatively calm geopolitics kinetically Relative to what? There's this trend in history that every hundred years there's a giant blow up, lots of violence, followed by peace. It's likely that we would have had 80 years of relative calm due to that cycle even if nukes hadn't happened
- baq 7mo ago> Relative to what? to WW1 and WW2.
- pizlonator 7mo agoHistory tells us that we would have had calm after WW2 even without nukes
- baq 7mo ago— someone in 1918, probably