2 ms·
The majority of vulnerabilities are in newly committed lines of code. This has been shown again and again [1] [2] From a marketing standpoint Anthropic is show
by jryio 6mo ago
The majority of vulnerabilities are in newly committed lines of code. This has been shown again and again [1] [2]
From a marketing standpoint Anthropic is showing that they're able to direct 'compute' to find vulnerabilities where human time/cost is not efficient or effective.
Project Glasswing is attempting to pay off as many of these old vulnerabilities as possible now so the low-hanging fruit has already been picked.
The next generation of Mythos and real world vulnerabilities exploits are going to be in newly committed code...
[1]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/2635868.2635880 https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/2635868.2635880
[2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22196 https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22196
- staticassertion 6mo ago> The majority of vulnerabilities are in newly committed lines of code. This has been shown again and again That's fine, I wouldn't argue against that. It doesn't really change things, right? > From a marketing standpoint Anthropic is showing that they're able to direct 'compute' to find vulnerabilities where human time/cost is not efficient or effective. Yes, they've demonstrated that.