Rails calls themselves MVC: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html#the-mvc-architecture http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html#the-mvc-a

Rails calls themselves MVC: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html#the-mvc-architecture http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html#the-mvc-a... I don't see the issue with calling it "ASP.NET MVC". The Visual Basic event-driven style of programming is fundamentally different from MVC. Calling it MVC provides context. Would you have preferred they come up with a "cute" name that doesn't explain what it is?