2 ms·
>>from The Ukraine It's just Ukraine. Unless you're doing this on purpose. >>and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 peo
by gambiting 7mo ago
>>from The Ukraine
It's just Ukraine. Unless you're doing this on purpose.
>>and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 people per hour
https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
It seems to hover around 30k dead a month recently, so 1000 people a day, divided by 24, that's actually ~41 people an hour.
But you know, even if we assume these numbers are wildly innacurate and only half those given...that's still 20 per hour?
>>X and Telegram channels are full of videos of freshly dug graves in The Ukraine.
No doubt, but what does that have to do with anything.
>>Edit: since Hypocrisy News is rate limiting me I can't reply to the redditor asking for a source:
So on one hand you call BBC a highly biased source, and then you link an article from it? So which one is it? Is it biased, or is it the source of your information?
- SanjayMehta 7mo agoClearly nuance is not your forte. Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring - poor choice of words but meh - Russia. Let that sink in. The real ratio must be much higher.
- gambiting 7mo ago>>The real ratio must be much higher. How can you make such a confident assumption? Like I said in another comment - it could be simply that Russians are being killed in places where Ukrainians can't or won't retrieve their bodies from. As Russians are the aggressors and moving into Ukrainian territory, this seems almost expected? >>Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring Russia Except they aren't doing that at all, because unlike you, they aren't equating bodies traded with KIA ratios. Maybe nuance isn't my forte, but then again, I'm not sure what yours is.