3 ms·
Treating quality investigative reporting like the scarce resource that it is, as one of the most well-known can you shed any light on why Reuters would delegate
by ricksunny 6mo ago
Treating quality investigative reporting like the scarce resource that it is, as one of the most well-known can you shed any light on why Reuters would delegate resources to commission investigative reporters to unmask Banksy (in a world where all-things-Epstein represents an unending source of investigative opportunities in the public interest)?
- HeyLaughingBoy 6mo agoBecause "the public interest" is more widely defined than you think.
- ricksunny 6mo agoI'm all ears: 1. Feel free to share why unmasking Banksy was in the public interest 2. Whether you feel all other public interest priorities had been served by investigative reporting prior to commissioning his unmasking.
- HeyLaughingBoy 6mo agoI have no idea, nor care, whether or not unmasking Banksy, specifically, was in the public interest. My only point is that it's not limited to topics that you consider important. As for your #2, that seems reminiscent of "why are we going to space when there are so many problems here on Earth."