Listen, I am not some anal, super-obsessive crazie, who gets his jollies out of finding minor discrepancies ( though it is fun in the middle of the argument ).

Listen, I am not some anal, super-obsessive crazie, who gets his jollies out of finding minor discrepancies ( though it is fun in the middle of the argument ). The article was interesting so I wanted to understand it and now I can't ( well, not without some hunting anyway ). Yeah, I am horrible person for asking that basic editorial standards are applied. The funny thing is, only a decade ago that kind of shoddy work would not fly.. or at least not be so commonly found.