3 ms·
Right, and often the tested depth isnt maximum. So you slowly acclimate to worse and worse code practices if the effort needed to undo it is the same as doing.
by datameta 6mo ago
Right, and often the tested depth isnt maximum. So you slowly acclimate to worse and worse code practices if the effort needed to undo it is the same as doing.
- tedmiston 6mo agosure, but undo isn't the only path to a newer better version of the code it's easy to see how the product (claude code) could be abstracted to spec form and then a future version built from that without inheriting previous iterations tech debt
- roughly 6mo ago> if the effort needed to undo it is the same as doing. That’s the rub, yes - as long as your failures are nice and gradual and proportional to the changes you’re making, everything’s fine.