3 ms·

A cheap undubsidized Android phone is $40 on Amazon

deleted 7mo ago
[deleted]
9rx 7mo ago
Amazon also only sells digitally. So now he has to buy a smartphone in order to get a smartphone from Amazon in order to get tickets? The guy doesn't even want one smartphone let alone two.
- raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
  Okay or Walmart are you now suggesting that the world should never move on from anything analog?
  - 9rx 7mo ago
    I am suggesting that if you have enough money to buy a ticket, but then take some portion of that amount away to buy a smartphone, you will no longer have enough to buy said ticket.
    - raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
      So someone has enough money to buy a season ticket and $40 extra is going to kill them?
      - crazygringo 7mo ago
        Seriously. We're talking something like $2500 minimum for the season, possibly much more. The cost of a budget phone is a rounding error.
      - deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
      - 9rx 7mo ago
        Meaning he could take on debt to cover what he doesn't have? Maybe, but finding a willing lender when you are 81 years of age isn't easy either.
        raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
        So he buys a $2500+ season ticket. But he needs to take on debt for a $40 phone?
        deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 7mo ago
        For the sake of simplicity, let's assume the ticket is exactly $2500. It was earlier given that he has enough to buy it. But if he buys the $40 smartphone first, then he only has $2460, which is less than $2500. Now he no longer has enough to buy the ticket. He can afford the ticket, or the smartphone, but not both. If not debt, where do you imagine the shortfall is going to be made up in order to buy both? Theft? Donation from you?
        raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
        And do you think he would not buy the season ticket if it were $40 more? When it goes up by $40 next year?
        9rx 7mo ago
        > And do you think he would not buy the season ticket if it were $40 more? That is the implication in the link: That he will not be able to buy season tickets this year due to them costing $40 more than he anticipated. But if you are trying to suggest that he has bought the tickets already, then what on earth are we talking about?
        raw_anon_1111 7mo ago

deleted 7mo ago

[deleted]

9rx 7mo ago

Amazon also only sells digitally. So now he has to buy a smartphone in order to get a smartphone from Amazon in order to get tickets? The guy doesn't even want one smartphone let alone two.

raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
Okay or Walmart are you now suggesting that the world should never move on from anything analog?
- 9rx 7mo ago
  I am suggesting that if you have enough money to buy a ticket, but then take some portion of that amount away to buy a smartphone, you will no longer have enough to buy said ticket.
  - raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
    So someone has enough money to buy a season ticket and $40 extra is going to kill them?
    - crazygringo 7mo ago
      Seriously. We're talking something like $2500 minimum for the season, possibly much more. The cost of a budget phone is a rounding error.
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - 9rx 7mo ago
      Meaning he could take on debt to cover what he doesn't have? Maybe, but finding a willing lender when you are 81 years of age isn't easy either.
      - raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
        So he buys a $2500+ season ticket. But he needs to take on debt for a $40 phone?
        deleted 7mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 7mo ago
        For the sake of simplicity, let's assume the ticket is exactly $2500. It was earlier given that he has enough to buy it. But if he buys the $40 smartphone first, then he only has $2460, which is less than $2500. Now he no longer has enough to buy the ticket. He can afford the ticket, or the smartphone, but not both. If not debt, where do you imagine the shortfall is going to be made up in order to buy both? Theft? Donation from you?
        raw_anon_1111 7mo ago
        And do you think he would not buy the season ticket if it were $40 more? When it goes up by $40 next year?
        9rx 7mo ago
        > And do you think he would not buy the season ticket if it were $40 more? That is the implication in the link: That he will not be able to buy season tickets this year due to them costing $40 more than he anticipated. But if you are trying to suggest that he has bought the tickets already, then what on earth are we talking about?
        raw_anon_1111 7mo ago