> but I think too many people are seeing the same symptoms (and some actually measured them). Or too many people are slurping up anecdotes from the same wateri

> but I think too many people are seeing the same symptoms (and some actually measured them). Or too many people are slurping up anecdotes from the same watering hole that confirms their opinions. Outside of academic papers, I don't think I've ever seen an example of "measuring" output that couldn't also be explained by stochastic variability.