3 ms·

26 cantons with a functioning federal regulatory mandate isn't remotely comparable to 50 states where broadband regulation has been in a decade long battle over

26 cantons with a functioning federal regulatory mandate isn't remotely comparable to 50 states where broadband regulation has been in a decade long battle over jurisdiction. > Third, have you looked at Swiss geography? They're pulling fiber up the alps to the damn huts. This is apples and oranges. The US is vastly more sparse. I think what is "f'ing ridiculous" is continuing to compare the 2 countries in ways they aren't comparable.

eqvinox 7mo ago
I made 4 other points. > 50 states where broadband regulation has been in a decade long battle over jurisdiction Thanks for making my point, all I'm arguing is that Switzerland had the political will while the US doesn't (yet?) You're essentially arguing the problem exists because the problem exists. It's a political problem, but a solvable one. Pretending that it isn't solvable really doesn't help.
- mexicocitinluez 7mo ago
  I don't have to refute all your points to prove it's impossible. > It's a political problem, but a solvable one. Pretending that it isn't solvable really doesn't help. Pretending like you hvae any clue how the US works doesn't help either. There are over 3,000 different counties in the US all with different rules around right-away (which could be one of like 6 different jurisdictions). There are quite literally hundreds of ISPs in the US. And even if one did want to build in NYC for instance, it would be have to interact with dozens of jurisdictions that don't magically go away with a strengthened FCC. And again, you're totally ignoring the physical geography of the land. So how exactly does that work at a legislative level? Forcing ISP in which communities specifically? Then, it not only becomes a political, but fiscal issue as well. Which is why saying "it's a political problem" is grossly over-simplifying the situation.

eqvinox 7mo ago

I made 4 other points. > 50 states where broadband regulation has been in a decade long battle over jurisdiction Thanks for making my point, all I'm arguing is that Switzerland had the political will while the US doesn't (yet?) You're essentially arguing the problem exists because the problem exists. It's a political problem, but a solvable one. Pretending that it isn't solvable really doesn't help.

mexicocitinluez 7mo ago
I don't have to refute all your points to prove it's impossible. > It's a political problem, but a solvable one. Pretending that it isn't solvable really doesn't help. Pretending like you hvae any clue how the US works doesn't help either. There are over 3,000 different counties in the US all with different rules around right-away (which could be one of like 6 different jurisdictions). There are quite literally hundreds of ISPs in the US. And even if one did want to build in NYC for instance, it would be have to interact with dozens of jurisdictions that don't magically go away with a strengthened FCC. And again, you're totally ignoring the physical geography of the land. So how exactly does that work at a legislative level? Forcing ISP in which communities specifically? Then, it not only becomes a political, but fiscal issue as well. Which is why saying "it's a political problem" is grossly over-simplifying the situation.