> arbitrary seizure of treaty-protected deposits One, Russia’s stuff hasn’t been seized. Europe tried. But, in true form, failed to get its act together. Two,

> arbitrary seizure of treaty-protected deposits One, Russia’s stuff hasn’t been seized. Europe tried. But, in true form, failed to get its act together. Two, is the argument really that Trump would be constrained by precedent if Europe and the U.S. got into a situation where seizing the former’s gold comes on the table?