3 ms·
> One of the first changes made to the Euro-Office codebase was to remove licensing terms deemed to be "unenforceable and non-obligatory" additions to the GNU A
by sdoering 6mo ago
> One of the first changes made to the Euro-Office codebase was to remove licensing terms deemed to be "unenforceable and non-obligatory" additions to the GNU AGPL licence. Three days later, the developers of OnlyOffice responded by publicly calling these changes a licensing violation. [1]
> ONLYOFFICE flags license violations in “Euro-Office” project by Nextcloud and IONOS [2]
Yes. IONOS. Sorry - I am out. I will never again touch anything this "little" shithole has an affiliation with if I can in any way help it. Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me. I won't let that happen.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro-Office https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro-Office
[2]: https://www.onlyoffice.com/blog/2026/03/onlyoffice-flags-license-violations-in-euro-office-project-by-nextcloud-and-ionos https://www.onlyoffice.com/blog/2026/03/onlyoffice-flags-lic...
- necovek 6mo agoI read section 7 of AGPLv3 quite differently from OnlyOffice: it clearly calls it "Additional Permissions" throughout, and also says this: When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of it. ... All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.