3 ms·
It does feel like also impact the usage meter for subscription plans?
by liuliu 6mo ago
It does feel like also impact the usage meter for subscription plans?
- raincole 6mo agoUsage meter has always been completely opaque anyway. They could (and probably did) shrink the limit whenever they like.
- mrtesthah 6mo agoOstensibly this makes usage meter rate changes more transparent?
- liuliu 6mo agoIt is a bit insidious that the price hike coincide with the end of 2x promotion, which makes the usage change a bit more obscure.
- HumanOstrich 6mo agoIt's not a price hike, it's actually making it easier to understand relative usage for different models/features.
- thejazzman 6mo agoI have no idea what I’m getting for $200/mo at this point. Maybe that’s on me, idk.
- ssl-3 6mo agoI have no idea what I'm getting for $20/mo, either. (But I do know that it's at least $180 less than what I could be spending, I suppose.)
- HumanOstrich 6mo agoFair point. We only have clear evidence they're being more transparent about credit pricing and value, but it's unclear whether that'll make people burn through usage faster or slower. The fuzziness is intentional. It gives them wiggle room and obscures how much "value" you actually get from $200, a 5-hour block, or a week. That keeps the tension manageable between subscription pricing and pay-per-token API pricing, especially for larger businesses on enterprise plans who want transparent $-per-MTok rates. If they were fully transparent, like "your $200 sub gets you up to $2,000 of equivalent API usage," it would be a constant fight. People would track pennies and scream any time 5-hour blocks got throttled during peak hours. Businesses would push harder for pay-per-token discounts seeing that juicy $200 sub value.