4 ms·
Really? Because if one accepts that computer languages are languages, then it seems that we could identify one or two that are highly specialized in logical co
by mylifeandtimes 6mo ago
Really?
Because if one accepts that computer languages are languages, then it seems that we could identify one or two that are highly specialized in logical conditions etc. Prolog springs to mind.
- malnourish 6mo agoYes, really. The concept GP is alluding to is called the Sapir-Worf hypothesis, which is largely non scientific pop linguistics drivel. Elements of a much weaker version have some scientific merit. Programming languages are not languages in the human brain nor the culture sense.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- skydhash 6mo agoWe have already proven that all the computing mechanism that those languages derive their semantic forms are equivalent to the Turing Machine. So C and Prolog are only different in terms of notations, not in terms of result.