3 ms·
> passive houses are often 1/5th of that. > 0.5 W/m²/K is a good value.... <...> for a wall it wouldn't even pass code in most of Europe There's a mix of misco
by friendzis 7mo ago
> passive houses are often 1/5th of that.
> 0.5 W/m²/K is a good value.... <...> for a wall it wouldn't even pass code in most of Europe
There's a mix of miscommunication and wat. I'm using approximate floor area values here, not perimeter walls. 0.1 W/m2/K for a WALL is definitely not a "passive" house, that's barely A++.
> I'm talking 25cm+ of rockwool in the walls, 40cm on the roof and triple pane windows,
Yep, this gets you something like 0.5 realistic, maaaaybe up to 0.3 in the models.