4 ms·
First you say this: "I don't think Firefox from the day it came out to the present day is all that great in terms of UX." Then you prove that statement by talk
by TwoBit 14y ago
First you say this:
"I don't think Firefox from the day it came out to the present day is all that great in terms of UX." Then you prove that statement by talking about who invented features first and say "The driver to innovative browser UI had always been Opera".
These two things are unrelated. I stopped reading after that.
- dobro 14y agoPeople that "stopped reading" after some point, but still went on to rant about an article, rarely provide any useful insight. Case in point. Oh, and "those two things" are not unrelated. His argument is that Firefox never drove UI innovation, and almost all the good things we now take for granted were copied from other browsers (Opera and Chrome). Left to itself, Firefox had (and would continue to have) a subpar UI. Your point is that being a late adopter of UI goodness doesn't preclude you having a good UI. But "good UI" is relative. If you are a late adopter your UI is always worse than the competition.