3 ms·

Copilot Subsystem for Copilot

• netule 7mo ago
  Copilot Copilot for Copilot
  • SXX 7mo ago
    Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot
    • adharmad 7mo ago
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
    • unangst 7mo ago
      Copilot copilots Copilot copilots copilot copilot Copilot copilots
      • simonw 7mo ago
        Woah that actually works... Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots, which other Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots assist, themselves assist Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots.
      • x______________ 7mo ago
        I just woke up, please for the love of ai slop, stop before you break my definition of the word copilot! (Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..)
        • tkrn 7mo ago
          After reading this thread, my brain is now convinced that copilots are actually some sort of small South American mammals. I think I'll stick to that definition; I don't want to lose my mental image of the daft-looking little copilots roaming around the Inter-Andean valleys that their more menacing-looking ancestors once inhabited. Yeah, cute little things.
        • MarsIronPI 7mo ago
          > (Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..) Too late. Microsoft already caused that to happen.
    • bryanrasmussen 7mo ago
      I guess it does sort of work as a "grammatical infinity" idea https://medium.com/luminasticity/cardinality-and-growth-rate-of-grammatical-infinities-721a426968f1 https://medium.com/luminasticity/cardinality-and-growth-rate... Like an imperative, because copilot can exist as a verb, I copilot a plane, and Copilot can exist as a software product, and as a helper in a software product that is itself a software product that helps you use the software product it is a helper to So Copilot copilot! could be an imperative for Copilot to Copilot, and Copilot Copilot could be a description of a software product that helps people use a software product named Copilot, but the second is not really grammatically correct as a sentence, whereas the imperative is. So in the end I guess you could have a Copilot Copilot..[infinite Copilots]..copilot!
  • GolfPopper 7mo ago
    You could try Copilot Copilot for Windows with Windows Copilot. I know it's still got Copilot in it, but not as much as Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot MS Office for Windows Copilot.
    • chuckadams 7mo ago
      But I don't like Copilot!
  • deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  • mrbonner 7mo ago
    You're talking about the aladeen or that aladeen? I don't understand which aladeen you are talking about.
  • deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  • microtonal 7mo ago
    Someone can probably make a valid "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" out of Copilot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal...
• port11 7mo ago
  Copilot OS