4 ms·
Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.
by yreg 6mo ago
Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.
- chatmasta 6mo agoThey’ve improved it since the initial launch when the service, model names and plan names all sounded similar and contradictory.
- jayknight 6mo agoNext year they will introduce "hAIngouts" as an AI chat bot.
- layer8 6mo agoOuch. Maybe "Google wAIve" for collaborative chats.
- ayewo 6mo ago> Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines. I think they were lucky this time that they landed a good name after only a few iterations that has since stuck. Anyone remember Google Bard or LaMDA?
- spencerflem 6mo agoI still like the name Bard
- chirau 6mo agoThe r/Bard subreddit is still quite active for some reason. Reminds me of Google Glass.
- owlninja 6mo agoDidn't it start as Bard?
- surajrmal 6mo agoWell it depends on what you're talking about. The model names were originally called lambda, followed by palm and then finally gemini. The chatbot product was internally known as meena, launched as Bard, and then transitioned to Gemini once the Gemini model came out.
- nurettin 6mo agothere is vertex ai, notebooklm, antigravity, nano banana, veo, lyria, the open models are gemma and gato