3 ms·
I genuinely couldn’t figure out why the article highlighted her. If it were any other publication, I’d suspect rage baiting. But maybe HN sees something I didn’
by JumpCrisscross 7mo ago
I genuinely couldn’t figure out why the article highlighted her. If it were any other publication, I’d suspect rage baiting. But maybe HN sees something I didn’t.
- slibhb 7mo agoThe NYT had a rough patch a while back but it's incredibly good nowadays. They absolutely didn't have to include the details here (like $60/month) but did because they care about the truth.
- readthenotes1 7mo agoI can't tell if this is sarcasm about the newspaper that just worried yesterday about the North American Treaty Organization. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15705545/New-York-Times-NATO-mistake-headline-correction-Trump.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15705545/New-York-T...