3 ms·
> The question remains whether or not she would have written this book had she not been fired. Assume the answer is no. What does this change about any of this
by pests 6mo ago
> The question remains whether or not she would have written this book had she not been fired.
Assume the answer is no. What does this change about any of this?
- bena 6mo agoShe’s attempting to use the public to bludgeon Meta. This is a fight among shitty people. I will not lionize either side. They both contributed to the shitty state of affairs today. Meta can burn and she can go broke. I’m fine with both
- pests 6mo agoThat's a good reaction to have. Thankfully she wrote the book so we know about all these bad deeds.
- prepend 6mo agoI don’t think the book revealed anything new about FB’s bad deeds, though. Was there novel info? I think its just more exposure for already bad things. Had she had a trove of emails or something, I might thing differently. This is quite different from the recent lawsuits that produced novel material and evidence.
- pests 6mo agoKnowing something is happening and reading detailed descriptions of them actually occurring is different, IMO. I learned things I didn't know while reading it, at least.