5 ms·
Well women are the rate limiting factor in having more men produced for war fodder. It probably makes more sense to ban birth control at the same time men are
by mothballed 7mo ago
Well women are the rate limiting factor in having more men produced for war fodder.
It probably makes more sense to ban birth control at the same time men are required to die for the war machine as both would then be playing out their slavery-induced biological role in ensuring survival of the nation. That is if you're down with the whole slavery for war thing.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- missedthecue 7mo agoBiologically true, but probably not in practice. Do we think Ukraine will compell women to repopulate postwar? It won't happen.
- School-Cotton 7mo agoThat’s essentially what the commenter is proposing when talking about banning birth control. This would be equivalent to compelling women to reproduce (or forego sexual relations, which in reality most people won’t do).
- Qem 7mo agoWouldn't make more sense instead of make conscription mandatory only for men, to make it mandatory for all childless people then?
- samus 7mo agoMost actively wars are over long before the replacement rate starts to matter, and women that get pregnant or raise children will in all likelihood get an excemption from frontline duty.