11 ms·
That’s surprising, as the OpenClaw installation makes it pretty difficult to run without auth and explicit device pairing (I don’t even know if that’s possible)
by stingraycharles 7mo ago
That’s surprising, as the OpenClaw installation makes it pretty difficult to run without auth and explicit device pairing (I don’t even know if that’s possible).
- bootsmann 7mo agoThe problem is that a lot of users of OpenClaw use a chatbot to set it up for them so it has a habit of killing safety features if it runs into roadblocks due to user requests. This makes installations super heterogeneous.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- nightpool 7mo agoI agree—it looks like the OP didn't provide any sources for these numbers either. That's why I would have hoped that the original maintainer had a better set of metrics to dispute them. It doesn't seem like he does though :(
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- ctoth 7mo agoThose numbers aren't in the CVE. You introduced them, attributed them to a source that doesn't contain them, and now you're disclaiming them. Where did they come from, and what was the goal of sharing them?
- pacificpendant 7mo agoI’m not the person you’re talking to but the stats are copied from the second link in the post, the web archive one.
- nightpool 7mo agoThe numbers were in the post when I clicked through and when I made the comment. It looks like the HN moderators have since changed the link for the post to go to the CVE entry. However, my comment was about the reddit thread, not the CVE entry.