The actual problem with technocracy is that you create a formalized hierarchy of leaders and rabble based on some credential granting authority that the technoc

The actual problem with technocracy is that you create a formalized hierarchy of leaders and rabble based on some credential granting authority that the technocrats control. That's a recipe for disaster. The technocrats define who can be a technocrat, and can design the process to benefit them. The incentives are towards elitist, racist, cronyist policies that would select for sociopathic tendencies. What's the difference between a technocrat and a bishop in this case?