3 ms·
> I'm not suggesting that Iran shouldn't have a military, but instead questioning the purposes for which it would have one. Well, they're currently being attac
by Planktonne 7mo ago
> I'm not suggesting that Iran shouldn't have a military, but instead questioning the purposes for which it would have one.
Well, they're currently being attacked. "Defending against attackers" is a pretty important purpose for a military.
- ericmay 7mo ago[flagged]
- lovich 7mo agoThere is no civilization on the planet that would accept full disarmament under the logic that they should just trust that you won’t attack them if they weren’t armed.
- craftkiller 7mo ago> Notice how it's just Iran that's being attacked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Lebanon_war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Lebanon_war
- ericmay 7mo agoYes, Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy who has, in violation of UN actions and against Lebanese government wishes seized and held territory in Lebanon from which to launch rockets into Israel lol. If you're going to use that as such a loose category than the list of countries that have been attacked expands quite a bit. Israel has attacked Iran, while Iran has attacked Israel, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Oman, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, USA, and maybe one or two others that I'm not thinking of.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- donkeybeer 7mo agoDo we now start listing American proxies and their terrorism? CONTRA alone should make the USA deserving of several nukes dropped on its lands by that measure.
- donkeybeer 7mo agoIran hasn't attacked USA or Israel. USA and Israel are the invaders that attacked Iran.
- newAccount2025 7mo agoLike, this very second? It’s been ones of months since USA attacked Venzuela. We are openly musing about invading Greenland. We are actively embargoing and threatening to invade Cuba. We are the unhinged aggressor in all of this.
- ajsnigrutin 7mo agoLet's be fair, if someone bombed trump right now, most of the world would be happy, including a lot of americans. Does that mean that someone should bomb US because of your regime? I mean... you have more homeless people living in tents than most cities post some natural disaster, your people can't afford education, healthcare nor (as above) homes, and you guys are spending money to bomb a place half a planet away that is in no way endangering you... and that after you've bombed it once before and "completely destroyed the nuclear program"... and before that and before that. I mean... i understand americans are well... americans, but you guys can't even imprison pedos running your country, why should you decide who to bomb? I mean.. what's next? Iranian special forces will eventually start destroying stuff in US, and you guys will claim "terrorism" or something again... well, it's not terrorism if you're in a war.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]