3 ms·
You have to be a normie to believe that a ground operation as currently envisaged by the US political leaders would be anything else but a suicide mission. This
by paganel 7mo ago
You have to be a normie to believe that a ground operation as currently envisaged by the US political leaders would be anything else but a suicide mission. This is not about “winning arguments on the internet” or some such, because in the end these arguments do not matter, it’s a basic matter of not sending men to die in a suicide mission.
Unless this being a suicide mission isn’t the stated goal of the current US political leaders, but that’s another discussion.
- notepad0x90 7mo agoyou have a broad definition of what a suicide mission is. Are you saying only US soldiers will die? Was Normandy a suicide mission? Does the US not have superior air-power, even though Iranians have more soldiers and home field advantage? I never claimed it won't be carnage or that casualties would be low. And btw, "normie" is not the insult you think it is, it only serves your ego. We can talk about the strategic goals, but strategy isn't what makes a mission "sucidie", it's when the only outcome of the mission is everyone involved will die that you call it a suicide mission. If there is a reasonable chance that a significant number of troops won't die, it isn't "suicide".