4 ms·
For one, it is awful on mobile. We can have bare, simple sites while still making them accessible.
by Esophagus4 7mo ago
For one, it is awful on mobile.
We can have bare, simple sites while still making them accessible.
- Dansvidania 7mo agoWhy is it awful? Most barebones websites are naturally responsive..
- zadikian 7mo agoI don't usually see this because it seems to require intentional design to work on mobile. The original post has an example that doesn't lay out well on mobile, or just a very tall and thin desktop window.
- dfxm12 7mo agoTalking about the url provided in the OP, one click on Firefox for mobile and it should be obvious. Text wider than then the screen, yellow text on white background. line spacing that's too tight, a background image that obscures text...