4 ms·
Looks like a nice wrapper around the APIs. Extremely oversold landing page, very marketing heavy for what it is. You can actually make nice looking landing page
by furyofantares 7mo ago
Looks like a nice wrapper around the APIs. Extremely oversold landing page, very marketing heavy for what it is. You can actually make nice looking landing pages that are about 10% the size of this and more straightforward, rather than some mimicry of a SaaS that's trying desperately to sell you something. Makes it easier for you to review the content for factuality too, and heck you couldn't even take ownership of some of the voice.
Hard to know what to do with this. I'm interested in the project and know others who would be, but I feel like shit after being slopped on by a landing page and I don't wish to slop on my friends by sharing it with them. I suppose the github link is indeed significantly better, I'll share that.
- xandrius 7mo agoIt's absolutely free and open source, no need to bash it like this.
- furyofantares 7mo agoI certainly don't feel entitled to anybody's effort, and I appreciate the project itself! It's just these flashy LLM-generated webpages are really misleading. It's filled with attention-grabbing LLM-filler. It presents itself as high-effort content, but in reality is unclear if it's accurate, unclear how much the author even put into READING the content they're asking me to read, and overall just really unclear what parts of the page are important to the author and what are just stuff the LLM inserted into a marketing card to make it look like a SaaS sales pitch.
- wrxd 7mo agoIf you dislike the slop on the website so much you might also not like GitHub that much. It shows this software has been heavily co-written by Claude code
- furyofantares 7mo agoI'm aware of that! That's fine with me.