2 ms·
That would imply that their annual budget was £1.8e14, which I seriously doubt. Even if I assume that you meant 0.02%, which is equal to 0.0002, that would put
by TimK65 6mo ago
That would imply that their annual budget was £1.8e14, which I seriously doubt.
Even if I assume that you meant 0.02%, which is equal to 0.0002, that would put their budget at £1.8e12, which I am also strongly inclined to doubt.
- gnfargbl 6mo agoThe NHS's actual current annual budget is £195.6B in 2025/2026 [1]. The contract value declared at the link given above is £182M over 5 years. So: 100 × ((182/5)/196000) = 0.019% Which, to me, still seems too high a number for a data management function: I make it about 1000 persons-worth of per-capita GDP. [1] https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/financial-performance-update-6/ https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/financial-performance-u...
- basket_horse 6mo agoI think you would need a lot more context to say if 0.019% is too high. If this platform is driving real operational improvements and is the core software backbone, then it doesn't seem particularly unreasonable.