Read his comment in context. The comment thread, condensed, is: mudkipdev says "There can't be any interesting discussion about AI programming". We agree that

Read his comment in context. The comment thread, condensed, is: mudkipdev says "There can't be any interesting discussion about AI programming". We agree that is a universal claim. (Right? I mean, your comment says "You know that it would be extremely unreasonable for someone to think that nobody, anywhere, has anything to say about LLMs right" but isn't this a clear example?) I say "There can be". We agree that is anecdotal. mrcsharp says "For me, [stuff that supports mudkipdev]. Therefore, there is no interesting discussion". He is re-asserting mudkipdev's point. mudkipdev says A, I say !A, he says, actually, A. Your interpretation has him read the back-and-forth between me and mudkipdev, and respond to "A", "!A" with "B". If you only read mrcsharp and nothing else in the thread I can understand this reading, but the context changes things.