3 ms·
The economic expansion you refer to was fueled by what was happening with the Internet. Clinton had nothing to do with that. He just happened to be there while
by vectorpush 14y ago
The economic expansion you refer to was fueled by what was happening with the Internet. Clinton had nothing to do with that. He just happened to be there while it was happening. Some folks choose to ignore the facts and attribute the economic expansion to his administration.
It's clear you merely skimmed over my post since in the very next sentence I stated:
There are those who are quick to point out that president Clinton can't really take that much credit for the complex factors that supervene in the emergence of an economic boom, they then go on to contradict themselves by suggesting that Romney does have the power to give everyone a job.
I follow it up with an explanation of how the president generally defers to advisers with regard to issues of the economy.
- robomartin 14y agoGo take a logical reasoning class and then we can have a discussion. There is no nexus between these scenarios. None.
- vectorpush 14y agoYou can attempt to levy personal insults against me, but it only makes you look foolish. You cannot confidently claim that Romney will fix the economy while simultaneously dismissing the supposed economic accomplishments of Clinton without contradicting yourself. The logic is simple, no classes necessary.